Friday, August 31, 2012

The Conclusion of the RNC

Did you tune in to the final night of the Republican National Convention?

I was tuned in and had many thoughts of this event. There were highlights and lowlights of the night. For myself I would have to say Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio spoke well and fired up the base. Romney seemed to do well for Romney, but didn't really do anything for me, I personally enjoyed his son and the video about Romney even more. 

But the lowest of low had to be the Clint Eastwood piece. It was really confusing, awkward, uncomfortable, and disrespectful to the President. View the video below. Also it just doesn't fit well with the other much better presentations of the final primetime night.



What do you think? Did you tune in? Are you ready for the DNC? Did you expect more details on how those 12 million jobs would be secured?


--Krystal

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Where does America stand?

Condoleeza Rice at RNC 8/29/12
Has anyone been watching the Republican National Convention this week?

Regardless of political viewpoints I try to keep up with what is being said on both party lines and have tuned in to the highlights or lowlights (depending on your view) of the RNC. Last night I think most would agree that former Secretary of State, Condoleeza Rice, was a highlight of the event thus far. It can be very difficult at times when watching these events because most intelligent and well spoken individuals will say all of the right things and can sometimes have you leaning their way on certain topics. A few make you feel inspired  key buzz word phrases from Ms.Rice's speech were "Where does America stand.." "Compassionate nation" "K-12 crisis" "Failing neighborhood schools.." all of these will get most individuals from any political background fired up. She even starts her speech with 9/11 which grabs everyone's attention from the beginning. I even found myself saying "yeah she is right.." but then I remember that there is so much more that goes into accomplishing these goals and it is bigger than just one individual.

After seeing Condoleeza Rice last night many also speculate as to whether or not she is setting herself up for the 2016 Republican ticket. This would not surprise me and may be a good move for the party, if they are ready for that. Rice is respected by many and would be able to get a lot of strong support. I wonder if that is a move the socially conservative America is ready for? And would they support her completely?


Where does America stand is a great question to bring up. Are we progressing? Are billions in debt paying off for the people? Could a black woman win the conservative support?

For Condoleeza Rice's complete speech at the convention click here.



--Krystal

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Eating Locally?

I was just listening to an interesting argument from Freakonomics radio about the best ways to protect the environment and make good eating choices. While there are many positives to buying and consuming local produce and groceries, this isn't always the smartest environmental choice. In fact with so much energy behind this trendy movement of growing your own food (even in downtown centers and large metropolises!), people are unable to see the drawbacks of these ideas. While it is great in many ways to have a garden and produce your own food, think about the land that this garden takes up in an urban space. In DC, there are many community gardens, taking up a few acres of land throughout the city. If those acres were used instead to build high rise apartment buildings instead, this would be a better investment in reducing greenhouse gases and carbon emissions.
Cities are a vital part of reducing greenhouse gases--the closer in proximity that the population lives, works, and plays, the more shared resources, the less transportation costs, and the more green space and clean air in other places. High rises are actually super efficient uses of energy, as are large office buildings, and other communal spaces.

Another thing to be wary of when shopping local is the climate. If you are buying local tomatoes and you live in the Northeast United States, for example, or the UK, you are creating more greenhouse gases then by buying tomatoes from Spain. This is true because it takes a special process to grow tomatoes in bulk on farms in New England and in similar climates. In Spain, it is the appropriate climate to naturally grow this product, and even when you factor in the environmental cost of shipping, the carbon emissions will be less.

According to this radio show, the single greatest impact an individual can have is to be conscious of their animal product (particularly cow) intake. If everyone cut out eating dairy and meat from a cow for two days each week, this would have a greater positive impact on the environment then shopping local. This is because cows are huge producers of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas.

While some movements get wind and strength beneath them, it is important to investigate further and see what unanswered questions there are. In this case, growing veggie gardens and eating local foods are generally good things, or at the very least benign, but when you think about really affecting change, there are much better ways of doing that. This goes back to the idea of trendy ideas. Some ideas catch on with pop culture and mainstream media, and we run with them without asking questions. This is unfortunate, as there are many perspectives on the same issue, ie, this issue of building high rises for people to live in having a stronger environmental impact then green space and urban gardening. In the future, we ought to really focus on strengthening our cities and encouraging people to live together in community instead of on "their own" land. This has many social implications and benefits, of course, this issue of increased sustainability and reduced carbon emissions just being one component.

--Megan

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Generational Differences

A conversation with family really led me to thinking about the differences withing age groups and varying generations and how cultures and viewpoints have evolved.

After debating with a family member about the women of today he said that we couldn't agree on the issue because people growing up today are too accepting of alternative lifestyles to the point that we can't even realize how things have changed so drastically. Now this was said to me in a negative tone implying that the liberal media and law have led to a generation displaced from traditional values.

I didn't want to debate any longer on what should and shouldn't be expected or accepted in our society, but this conversation did make me think. Are the Baby Boom generation and Generation X that different from the younger generations?

Obviously some things have changed, new laws have been passed and some people are more accepting of different lifestyles. I would also argue that being different may be more accepted today, but people have always been different whether just in private or out in the open. It frustrates me that some people blame the younger generations for things that they find to be less traditional. There are always fades that take over each generation, but it takes more than a few to change the values of society and with that said why does change have to be bad? The world is ever evolving shouldn't we be evolving with it?


--Krystal

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

It's Not Trendy to Care About the Environment

Many things that are "movements" or considered "trendy" in the States are very common ways of life in other countries. 
Here, people that care about the environment are "conservationalists," and "tree-huggers," "hippies," or "environmentalists." In other parts around the world, they conserve just as a way of life. No large movement was necessary to get people to turn off lights or running water when they weren't using it, nobody went around teaching recycling. Everyone recycles, conserves, and uses what they need. 
When we make things "trendy," we isolate groups of people who don't feel that they can be trendy or don't know if they want to be trendy. By labeling people and things, certain groups do not naturally fall or do not choose to be a part of these groups. 
Conserving energy and water and being good to the earth shouldn't be a trend or a movement--it should just be the way we live. We need to teach this not as something you do if you're "elitist," but something you do if you live on the planet. 

This should be imperative to all people, just like eating and sleeping. It should be second-nature, you respect other people, you respect the earth you live on. Instead, it seems to be more of a suggestion and a certain demographic of Americans is on board, while mass chunks of the population is not. Recycling and conserving is something that anyone of any age, socioeconomic status, location, race, or creed can do. I suppose we have marketed being "green" to a young, trendy, college-educated demographic, and thus by doing so, isolated older generations, and people of different socioeconomic statuses. Because of this, many people consider environmentalism (and other important "movements") a passing trend, and not something they need to worry about. 

Does anyone have suggestions as to how to change this way of thinking? How do we make caring for the planet more accessible to all? 

--megan 


Sunday, August 5, 2012

Born for Greatness

This is that great season of the Olympics and like most people around the world I have become completely infatuated with the games and all of the extensive coverage. I have also been amazed by the skills and performances of several olympians and wonder how are these individuals able to become so talented at such a young age. Obviously for some it is just the fact that they have pure talent and given athletic ability, but for others they have been training for these events their entire lives. At a very early age they have selected their sport or atleast displayed some sort of interest or talent. That talent or interest is then manifested through practices, coaches, and lot of continued involvement in related activities.

This is all well and great for the Olympics, but it really just has me thinking about the paths we choose and wondering how much does what we do in our early years impact our entire life. While Missy Franklin was swimming in a pool at age 6, I was just your average 1st grader. But then again maybe I was starting something extraordinary and didn't even realize it. I've always been one to write down what I am thinking and now here I am with a blog. Not a handful of Olympic medals, but it is something.

As you contoinue to watch the Olympics you will hear story after story about these individuals who have been training for this moment for their entire lives. It is truly amazing, but take the time to also think about what you have gone through and how your path has shaped your journey. Enjoy the Olympic games and Go USA!

--Krystal